The Winding Path – 122

For the context of the following comments and to reply, please click on the DATE/TIME  above them.

2015-03-22 09:46

carolyntclark – ” I just knew that without the God factor the mysteries of suffering can be explained by the randomness of nature.”

What about nature qualifies as random?

2015-03-22 10:00

sTv0 – “N. DeGrasse Tyson says: ‘If you’re scientifically literate, the world looks very different to you, and that understanding empowers you.’ “

Relatively speaking…

Different than before but no more or less informed or empowered except in our own satisfaction.

2015-03-23 10:36

sTv0 – “I take it you’ve not had much science education…?”

 

What is the required threshold of “much”?

Is there a point where the absolute no longer provides context for the relative?

In terms of the eternal NOW, are the makers of this;

ancient-art-001-700x324

Less informed and empowered than us?

Or, they in turn, somehow more of something (real?), than their own ancestors.

ancient-art-002-700x524

In terms of the eternal NOW.

 

 

Alms and Patronage

Alms and Patronage. If this work seems good, and you can help.

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in logs and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.